Nostr Archives

Network Explorer

API GitHub

edouard

6bf906…c54087

edouardnevres@nostrplebs.com

Followers

Following

356

Notes indexed

Latest notes

/v1/events?pubkey=6bf906a41297ea2e7f261db9f3696a394e8d0dd35edbf037802b0a6933c54087

edouard2h ago

I don’t understand why core 30 changed that. Even before core 30 a motivated attacker could (one of the arguments of core for changing) and it was indeed a situation where 99.9 pct of nodes were a running restrictive relay policy. And if you believe that most nodes having a restrictive or relax relay policy does not matter you can’t be mad at core 30 for changing that. So my position is : “I wish consensus rules were different but they are the way they are and changing them is not not-costly and should be done carefully” and “I wish core did not change relay policy rule let’s continue to try to gather consensus first on this”

Network

Following

Theo

preston

cobie

edouard7h ago

You are right ; we should continue. 20% of knots and 20% core 30 so 80 pct network running 80 capped op_return. I would have preferred consensus to have capped op_return but the conservativeness in changing consensus is very important too (and, less so but also, the simplicity of consensus rules) I disagree with changes implemented in relay policy by core. I believe it is reckless and arrogant. core has too much influence on the network through this type of changes I agree. But I am also happy that core can’t change consensus rules too easily. I also want home solo mining to increase and I believe it will and we should aim for as much as possible designing own blocks through ocean Then for BIP-110 itself I understand the motivation, the frustration etc, I am hesitating but it might be (at this stage at least) a bad precedent if it were to succeed and if does not reinforce core

0100 sats