tinfoil hash

probably not, but… more software should embrace a state of being “done”.

verify the integrity of a file using nostr’s web of trust: https://verify.tinfoilhash.com

verifying files with gpg kind of sucks, right? i've started bridging gpg verified files to nostr to make it easier. just drop a file in https://verify.tinfoilhash.com and you're on your way, starting with the following packages: - bitcoin core - coldcard by @Coinkite @DETERMINISTIC OPTIMISM 🌞 - seedsigner by @SeedSigner - sparrow by @craigraw the hope is that the authors of these packages start signing and publishing directly with their own nostr identity. until then, the bridging code is fully open source and auditable, so you can decide whether to trust me or not: https://github.com/tinfoilhash/verify-from-gpg

i’ve been thinking about this. what about discovery of projects and issues? it still feels like a project outside of gh is at a disadvantage.

it’s easier to over-complicate things than to keep it simple, stupid. not just with code either.

https://docs.start9.com/0.3.5.x/service-guides/lightning/… the guide is for zeus wallet, but it works with any wallet that supports lightning node connect.

have you tried lightning node connect via lightning terminal? faster and more reliable than tor, at least.

because they’re (mostly? all?) centralized?

how do you do this? how does a consumer verify a release?

tor exit node