RamenCoffee

what do you think endgame pricibg wiill be ?

emergent behavior can be hard to suss out from anecdotal observations.

the protocol cannot solve the spam problem. Only client implementations can.

I definitionally disagree.

I've speculated to myself alot that there will eventually be parity between compute price and human price. However, most things should also come down in price, leaving the best humans with much,uch more wealth and power.

I have this fever dream of a party whose representatives only vote according to questions sent to their member's phones. While great in theory, I'm not willing to die for a good idea. what do you think ?

Lol

Look I respect your opinion, but I'm still unconvinced by that argument. There is a difference between CSAM images on a hard drive and block data. At most we are talking about filling entire blocks with 4 Mb per 10 minutes that are basically unaccessible by non-techies ? Motivated individuals are able to access such images regardless. So idk what restricting data is going to lead to. I don't see the state going to each and every home to try to restrict some random data that's hard to pin down. To be convinced of your point I would need to see some arrests and a weakening of the network.

It changes nothing to the trust model : many eyes on the code. Code is law. Blackmail of core devs was always in the threat model.

Can there ever be trustable privacy in a centralized shitcoin ?

I thought it was a good podcast. Thank you for taking the time.

i have not heard of him. However, while you are 100% correct to raise doubts, remember that people dug up saylors btc hate tweets from 2013. Now the guy is a complete degen with the best of em. Hard to tell someone's disposition with just 2 tweets from 5 years ago.