cheesypleb

There is a difference between policing the data and welcoming spammers by: - providing official' support for large quantities of spam. - refusing to fix the bug which enabled inscriptions No one is claiming all spam can be stopped but deliberately removing friction for spammers is not a good idea for the long term health of the network. If spammers know that the network is hostile to them and there is a chance they will get rugged at some point in the future then that's a huge deterrent to VCs funding large scale spammers.

Custom build running start9 on proxmox. Hardware wallets. Bitaxe mining and building my own blocks with Datum, signalling BIP110 of course.

'Iranian media reports'... The first casualty of war is truth.

He's one of the most anti shitcoin voices on YouTube. How many years back are you going? Cant see anything except toxic bitcoin maximalism on his feed going back years.

We need less shitcoin apologists involved in bitcoin.

Why? MNAV was below one at many points in 2022.

He is absolutely right that the bitcoin community is unnecessary toxic towards treasury companies when they should adopt a 'bitcoin is for everyone' attitude. However he could have answered a lot of the questions less defensively, bitcoin going up will lift these companies back above nMAV 1 just as it did for strategy when they were below 1 for a good chunk of 22-23.

2. Then you realise that normie media headlines will be 'bitcoin supply increased to 21 quadrillion' and people laugh when you claim bitcoin is sound money.