OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Knut Svanholm ∞/21M45d ago
https://www.knutsvanholm.com/product-page/bip110-hat
πŸ’¬ 13 replies

Replies (13)

Marcus Satbard45d ago
Will you back up your words with sats? Otherwise, it’s an explicit shitfork promotion and proof that your words can’t be trusted. I can also offer a trustless swap of sats between the two chains. I’m willing to accept smaller amounts than @cedab81b…f882f13e. πŸ“ c71b8329… πŸ“ b1098d51…
000
0 sats
Jerome Powell 21iQ 40TPW45d ago
You're promoting gambling, pure shitcoiner energy. Why not just admit you're into Ethereum and Polymarket instead of trying to turn Bitcoin into that. 🀑
0000 sats
Marcus Satbard45d ago
Pushing a contentious fork is gambling. Moreover, not only at your own cost, but at the cost of bitcoin users.
0000 sats
Ferris Bueller37d ago
Will you back your words with a UASF? Instead of playing fiat futures games, work within Bitcoin’s rules and run it. Or are you unwilling to risk it all just to protect spam on-chain?
0000 sats
Jack D45d ago
I don't think bip110 improves bitcoin in any way, even though it's in the name. It's temporary and isn't improving on any existing problem. What am I missing? Improvements should be permanent.
0000 sats
Marcus Satbard45d ago
Indeed, it should be called BEP: Bitcoin Enshitification Proposal
0000 sats
Tauri37d ago
πŸ“ 8086f696…
0000 sats
Scrotus44d ago
0000 sats
Tauri37d ago
Using and abusing are not the same thing.
0000 sats
Jerome Powell 21iQ 40TPW44d ago
Why do you care what someone else does with their sats or their node? If you despise NFTs, why are you okay with core not fixing the bug that has allowed 40% of UTXOs being used for this garbage? Why are you okay with them profiting from basically turning Bitcoin into Ethereum? πŸ’©πŸͺ™πŸ§™β€β™‚️ BIP110 fixes this.
0000 sats
Jerome Powell 21iQ 40TPW45d ago
Fork would be unnecessary if contentious changes weren't made to core including the inscriptions bug which was redefined as a feature, rather than admitting it's a bug and patching. Probably because some of the devs were profiting off the shitcoinery that is inscriptions. Bitcoin is an electronic cash system NOT electronic trash system. You want NFTs, you're an ETH head shitcoiner. 🀑
0000 sats
Tauri37d ago
Segwit was contentious too. Miners and Core were against it. We got lightning out of it.
0000 sats
Tauri37d ago
BIP110 does exactly the opposite. πŸ“ 8086f696…
0000 sats