OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Marcus Satbard45d ago
Pushing a contentious fork is gambling. Moreover, not only at your own cost, but at the cost of bitcoin users.
💬 2 replies

Thread context

Root: c1dd9b2b2aec…

Replying to: 1284e0075b2a…

Replies (2)

Jerome Powell 21iQ 40TPW45d ago
Fork would be unnecessary if contentious changes weren't made to core including the inscriptions bug which was redefined as a feature, rather than admitting it's a bug and patching. Probably because some of the devs were profiting off the shitcoinery that is inscriptions. Bitcoin is an electronic cash system NOT electronic trash system. You want NFTs, you're an ETH head shitcoiner. 🤡
0000 sats
Tauri37d ago
Segwit was contentious too. Miners and Core were against it. We got lightning out of it.
0000 sats