OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Aaron van Wirdum25d ago
No miners are currently signaling support for BIP110, so investing time and effort in developing a URSF client seems like a waste of time and effort at this time (to me, anyways). Much easier to just use the rejectblock command post-fork if a BIP110 block that forks the chain is ever mined.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: ef06c4935833…

Replying to: 0cf7d60615de…

Replies (1)

Super Testnet25d ago
What if they don't signal support for BIP110 but just stop mining txs that violate the BIP110 rules, to avoid losing 8% of their users? I don't want OP_IF in taproot to become "effectively invalid" just because miners opt to comply with a bad BIP out of economic interests
0000 sats