OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Super Testnet25d ago
One way to do a URSF is to reject the block *after* BIP110's activation block unless it contains a tx that violates one of BIP110's restrictions. If enough people run it, miners have to choose: make the BIP110 people fork off or make the URSF people fork off. They can't keep both
💬 2 replies

Replies (2)

Aaron van Wirdum25d ago
No miners are currently signaling support for BIP110, so investing time and effort in developing a URSF client seems like a waste of time and effort at this time (to me, anyways). Much easier to just use the rejectblock command post-fork if a BIP110 block that forks the chain is ever mined.
0000 sats
AncapAnon - Activate OP_GFY now!25d ago
It will hurt my bags but I can’t help but be glad that noderunners will not be passive and hand the decision over to miners.
0000 sats