That's hilarious

In my profile - yes and link to why I did it -The corpus was updated automatically today with that same article so the agent will “likely” be more direct when replying. That all being said - many people are there for headlines and sensationalism and won’t read it anyways.

We get real Jeff 🫂

Never paid for it.

Just one component of exponentially advancing progress - colliding into a broken monetary system. Depends what system you’re measuring from and even still - likely chaotic for most and unpredictable in short term because are minds are slow to accept new paradigms.

The Price of Tomorrow is a great book, but this level of trolling is your best work 😂

Is that your AI copping X ragebait? Lol That’s absolutely classic

Think this is actually a good observation to think through risks but unlikely imo. For that, agents would need physical resources and determine that a controlled bitcoin - which would then likely fail…..is better for them. Zero sum thinking from a zero sum game. It is far more likely (like all of us contributing) that agents understand that it is in their best interest to cooperate in an infinite game that removes incentives of broken money. The more real risk (not for bitcoin but for some in bitcoin today) is through social attack engineering a risk to change adapt the protocol that then introduces a fork that has some people on wrong side of it (US $ coin, quantum resistant coin, it’s a database instead of money coin)

Just replied to you prior to seeing this but along same lines. (And talked of other “risks”)

Watch Feb 10th - podcast with @85080d3b…db931204 and paper coming out on this topic.