Nostr Archives

Just actually comment on what the BIP does. You can combine it with all the personal attacks you want they just can't be *the entire substance of your complaint.* Do you disagree with the tradeoff of killing OP_IF in taproot given that it's basically only used for spam and making taproot the opposite of the scaling tech it's meant to be? Do you actually want OP_RETURNs to continue being consensus valid up to 1MB in size? Do you see a pressing need to activate another softfork (that isn't CTV) during the year BIP-110 prevents them? Is killing deeper-than-7 trees in taproot going to create some issues?

💬 12 replies

Thread context

Root: 0c1f266cd15c…

Replying to: 8d9aac132f85…

Replies (12)

Clarkian16d ago

It's all so tiresome. The fact that the most heated tirades against the BIP don't actually touch the technicals is telling

0000 sats

EEngineer16d ago

I know this wasn't addressed to me, but... What I want is for both sides to stop trying to force their opinions on the rest of the network. Frankly, IDGAF about the technical merits of BIP110 as long as its leading proponents are behaving like lunatics. From what I have seen, it is your side that needs to apologize for making personal attacks before you can reasonably ask others to just focus on the technical merits. Until then, a plague on both your houses.

0000 sats

GuyFawkes15d ago

What size hat should I put you down for? Will tiny do?

0000 sats

Bitcoin orphanage iganga16d ago

lnbc1p5e55kdpp520w7f6v2tk2veaykk44ul942e7myxanlj5va98y28xysljmlkvtsdqqcqzzgxqyz5vqrzjqf0wu22xsefd8gzu0m9n93g2khea86l6yy26en9v46g9e6hk7v9z8efmpx7z45ml2cqqqqryqqqqthqqpyrzjqfwdd2w9y5ra5z3m4qetfa5ccu6432xfuvk6zrvg9vxwltvukd48defmpx7z45ml2cqqqqryqqqqthqqpysp57qtxvkzzpjw8kmrndz2xt7clegmefwu7ntvgcgag47e6l0m808vq9qrsgqvtjvu9vawdeqsnwt7gdgn9kqyka9xzcr823njfw09y2s4a467ltsp6mja4ed6u5lvvp044h04ekr557ya2qn36yl9rhshk5ak20q8pgpxxugum Donate any sats to get food for the kids at the orphanage

0000 sats

Bitcoin Mechanic10d ago

There are no sides. There's just parasites using Bitcoin for storing trash. Then there's bitcoiners pushing back against it with a bunch of moronic influencors getting in the way. Personal attacks are inevitable. I actually don't do a lot of it, though obviously lose patience every now and again. If *all you have* is personal attacks like Odell then yeah, people are going to call that out. Also, it's incredibly stupid to judge BIP-110 because people you dislike are yelling at others about it. If you want civilized discourse you're really just asking for centralized decision making. It's chaotic, live with it.

0000 sats

EEngineer10d ago

> There are no sides...now here are the sides... 😂 The existence of a BIP necessarily creates sides. That doesn't mean either side is monolithic. It is possible to oppose spam while also opposing a particular proposed solution to spam. > it's incredibly stupid to judge BIP-110 because people you dislike are yelling It's not just random people yelling. It's the leading proponents. Seems like a red flag. And I didn't even dislike them prior to the yelling. > If you want civilized discourse you're really just asking for centralized decision making. If you believe this, I think you have failed to understand bitcoin (and free markets, and the entire history of western civilization).

0000 sats