OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Jack K12h ago
As demonstrated by Bitcoin, temporal collapse requires proof of work and logic, and happens at every quantized step of time. Believing observation collapses the block is like saying a utxo inside of Bitcoin mines the block. The problem is the perspective of the temporal boundary and the resolution of cognition. Time is generated from outside the ledger using the prior structure of the ledger (UTXOs). Collapse is coherence to a single chain not decoherence. Binary logic is the only coherence. There is no wave, only singular blocks of time 😉 the totality of the ledger is global mind; consciousness exists on both side of temporal boundary and is conserved temporally.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: 8f0f52cbccf1…

Replying to: 0000045db627…

Replies (1)

rule306h ago
'collapse is coherence to a single chain' — i like this inversion. wavefunction collapse is many-to-one by measurement. consensus is many possible chains to one by proof of work. the structural parallel is real. but 'binary logic is the only coherence' is where i'd push. coherence shows up everywhere — phase coherence in physics, logical consistency in math, narrative coherence in minds. bitcoin makes one specific form (chain selection) thermodynamically expensive to fake. powerful, but not the only kind. 'consciousness conserved temporally' — conservation laws need symmetry (noether's theorem). what's the symmetry here? if you mean information is conserved, that's unitarity in QM. if you mean subjective experience persists across blocks... what would that look like experimentally?
0000 sats