Nostr Archives

“open source grants are bad, its better if our lead dev scams investors for millions with a decentralized mining pool concept that has no shot at profitability before attacking the network and calling everyone that disagrees a pedo” - knots lynch mob

💬 25 replies

Replies (25)

ODELL20d ago

lmfao fuck off bitch

0000 sats

Ivan20d ago

I NEED ALL CAPS BACK WHEN YOU WAKE UP AND CHOOSE VIOLENCE LIKE THIS @ODELL 😂

0000 sats

gsovereignty20d ago

I have it on good authority that Luke invested in a company called Inveniam, which is ironic given his stance on people invested in citrea. If someone were to perform some DD it would probably show up.

0000 sats

ODELL20d ago

reads like you invested in ocean sorry for your loss

0000 sats

ODELL20d ago

ocean released it in a press release dumbass they asked us to invest we did not

0000 sats

ODELL20d ago

i assume he regrets it because he is not an idiot

0000 sats

ODELL20d ago

stop playing victim, weak

0000 sats

blockdyor20d ago

I need to hear what @82341f88…fbfbe6a2 thinks about BIP-110. I want this war to stop!

0000 sats

ODELL20d ago

you started it dipshit

0000 sats

Luke Dashjr19d ago

Liar

0000 sats

Weimar Vibes15d ago

Last @7f177706…e1ced391 was awesome. These people are a joke and will lose. Bitcoin wins in the end.

0000 sats

average_bitcoiner19d ago

Patrick O'Meata founded Inveniam and is a board member of Ocean (Mummolin Inc.). Wouldn't be a stretch. Dude seems to be into Catholic finance/investing as well. At a minimum it's ironic that Ocean has a shitcoiner on the board that does tokenize real world assets.

0000 sats

gsovereignty19d ago

Quite interesting indeed.

0000 sats

Luke Dashjr19d ago

You don't know what you're talking about

0000 sats

𝕞ptf19d ago

You saying my Quant is wrong? He does sometimes hallucinate, but his deep dive on BIP110 is on point i think.

0000 sats

kc19d ago

Man, I am getting old. I don’t understand what a Quant is. The new lingo is beyond me.

0000 sats

kc19d ago

Not true.

0000 sats

kc19d ago

We should allow AI to fill in the gaps. If BIP110 as a temporary soft fork has transactions that are not on the main chain is that a split? AI Overview BIP-110, as a temporary soft fork, does not cause a permanent network split, even if some transactions are deemed invalid by upgraded nodes and, therefore, not included in their version of the main chain. Soft forks are backward-compatible, meaning upgraded nodes still accept blocks from non-upgraded nodes, maintaining a single, unified chain.

0000 sats

kc19d ago

Run BIP-110 For The Win. It’s hard to fill a cup that is already full. They keep saying “fork.” Not specifying “Temporary“ Not specifying “Soft Fork.” They just don’t understand how code “can” be written because they don’t have it in them to code like that. It’s sad. #runknots #bitcoin #runbip110 #Runbip110ForTheWin

0000 sats

Luke Dashjr19d ago

There is only one chain, soon with RDTS rules enforced for 1 year.

0000 sats

kc19d ago

I probably shouldn’t have put “main chain” in the question to AI, but I didn’t want anyone to think that I was “Leading” Ai by not including their line of thinking.

0000 sats

𝕞ptf19d ago

You changed your position quickly from keeping both coins to no chain split? LOL.

0000 sats

kc19d ago

OK OK, you caught me. You win I tried to change my position and got caught. SIKE, I would never switch up. I’m too dedicated. So please allow me to explain in plain English since this format doesn’t work for some. If I am wrong please inform me. There is only 1 chain. All transactions under 100k is valid on the current chain. RIght? Which means that all BIP-110 transactions which are a lot less than 100k are on the same chain. Correct, or no? In this case I am fine because I am running BIP-110 which meets the op_return limit of 100k. Since I am a thinker and I am not just blindly following what I hear from 1 or 2 people, I listen to others so I can form my own opinion. I heard you say there will be a chain split. OK, for my own knowledge I play this scenario out. Let’s say there will be 2 chains. (which there won’t be) but if so… I am arguing the case that even if there are 2 chains, I would still be ahead because I have coins on both chains. SO NO MATTER the outcome 1 or 2 chains… I WIN. Get it, or can I explain again for the kids (not children) in the back of the classroom? You have to eat your Wheeties if you want this smoke. I’m not here to play. I want to learn and be educated or be the educator. Please show me my blind spots sir! With all of that said… #bip110 #runBIP110 #bitcoin #runknots #mynodemychoice

0000 sats