ImYour Huckleberry
fef3ef…17371cFor the moment, let's leave religion out of this discussion. I will come back to it later. All Humans(people), by nature, have the same rights; not dependent on when, where, how, or what gender they are born. These Rights supersede all national affiliations and national laws. These are natural laws. They existed before there were governments and will remain after. First and foremost, All people own themselves. All people are entitled to the fruits of their own labor. All associations, transactions, contracts, agreements, sales, etc. of Any kind, for Any reason must be voluntary. (Non-Aggression Principle or NAP - Aggression/Coercion should not be used to force anyone to do, say, or agree to Anything. The ONLY time aggression may be used is in the defense of the life and rights of yourself (or others) from another party initiating aggression.) Theft of any kind is wrong. These represent my ETHICAL stance on way human society should be. I understand that this model of society does not exist on any large scale today and may not come to exist in my lifetime, but this is something to strive towards. _________________ So, what does this mean and how did I come to these beliefs? Human beings, by nature, have the right of Self Ownership: Nobody else can decide for you how you should live your life. Only You can decide what's best for you. There is no other person, no human authority, higher than yourself in your life. If you own yourself, then every other human being also has that same Self-Ownership. Therefore, You have No right to act as an authority on someone else's life without their consent. You can not tell someone else how to live their life without their consent. You can not use force or coercion on another person in any way, except in the defense of the life or property of another. THINK HARD HERE IF You have no RIGHT to dictate to the life of another person, THEN you have no ability to convey that right to somebody else (e.g. through an election, etc.) For Example: You have no RIGHT to take something that is mine. Since you don't have the RIGHT to take my stuff, you can not give that right to someone else to use on your behalf. So, you can not bestow the RIGHT (which we have already decided you don't have) on the government and call it a Tax. The concept of governance is that the people being governed confer their rights upon authority figures to act on their behalf VOLUNTARILY. But, you can only give what you already have. You CAN NOT confer to another person a right that you do not already have to use/exercise on your behalf. If you are NOT a voluntary participant in a nation, an agent of the government (tax collector, police officer, etc.) can not legitimately come to your house and have the RIGHT to take your stuff because nobody who voted for this person or put that person in charge had the authority to grant that right to begin with. Voluntary Associations: No person should be forced to participate in anything that they do not want to be a part of. That includes but is not limited to: Governments Religions Marriages Armed Forces Businesses Clubs or ANY OTHER group or activity for any reason. If you agree with these beliefs, if you share this ETHICAL stance then you might be surprised to know that you are an Anarchist/Voluntaryist. _______________ I used to say that I am proud to be an American. You can be proud of the people in your country, proud of the accomplishments and advances her people have made, and at the same time recognize that there are flaws inherent to the system. I think that our country was founded on good principles, but, over the years, these principles have been sidelined by the corporate and political interests of this world. At the time this country was conceived there were a great many difficulties to be overcome but there were fewer rules and laws. We believed in individual liberty and created a nation to protect that liberty. The founders did their best, but just as with all other things in this world, advances have been made and new ways of thinking have emerged. The founders did what they thought necessary at the time, but I highly doubt that they would be pleased at what their creation has become. Now, instead of listing the things we are Not allowed to do, it seems we list the things we Are allowed to do. The laws and regulations in place today are oppressive, tyrannical, and unnecessary. The "taxes" the government steals from us are excessive. The "taxes" collected from us are not put to good or even effective use. The use of our armed forces to promote our ECONOMIC interests is deplorable. Our whole system is CORRUPT. IN SHORT, we have turned into the very monster we fought so hard to escape. This Country is in dire need of a MAJOR shift in the way we do things. It is inevitable. If we don't fix the problem, the whole system is going to burn down on its own. And on its way down we will lose more and more of our liberty until it gets to the point where ANYTHING that the powers-that-be offer us will be better than our current situation. I believe that it is still possible to make a difference from within the system, but that it will not happen, so I prepare for the worst. The average American is blind to the problem. The average person cares less about freedom and more about security. Most people these days won't complain unless there is some major shift from their comfort zone. The average person would rather be told what to do than take control of their own fate, make their own decisions, and live with the consequences. They are Sheep. ___________ I am a Christian, not because my family is Christian or because all the cool people are Christian, but because I made that choice for myself after deep thought and study on the subject. Nobody forced me to make this decision. It is not POSSIBLE to force someone to be Christian/Muslim/Buddhist/etc. It is a belief one has. ________________ Do I think that there should be laws prohibiting behavior that I find immoral? Ethically, insofar as it does not involve anyone else or their property then No. As a Christian then yes there are some behaviors that I would be OK with punishing. Speaking specifically about the United States: I think that the foundation of this country is and always has been Christian. The writers of our Declaration of Independence, our Constitution, our Bill of Rights, and all the corresponding individual State documents knew this. They felt that they did not need to explicitly state it because it was so obvious. I think that they did us a disservice. They should have explicitly stated that our ethics, our laws, and our way of life are all bound by, and a consequence of, belief in Jesus the Christ, the Son of YHWH God Almighty. They should have forbade the substitution of any other religion or lack thereof for the basis of our laws and societal structure. It may have helped mitigate some of the corruption, decadence, and evil that now pervades every aspect of our nation. Any serious examination of the history of our founding and those involved can come to no other reasonable conclusion. Our country has Christian roots. I have changed my views over time. I once took the position of accepting the status quo. I have decided that is not good enough. It's not good enough because it concedes defeat. It compromises where there should be no compromise. Government has few legitimate responsibilities: Protect Life, Liberty, & Property Prevent Evil and promote Good where possible. If you can not define Evil and Good objectively then you can not fulfill the second responsibility. If our country is to have any hope of survival, this is the only path I can see... __________________ Render unto Caesar... I pay my taxes. I don't want government thugs breaking down my door and hauling me off to a cage because I didn't want to let them steal the fruits of my labor. As long as the situation remains the same here I will continue to pay my taxes.
Followers
39
Following
93
Notes indexed
1
Latest notes
/v1/events?pubkey=fef3efbbdf9176f9382a67b4eeb6bc4bfa8f5b4b1b39d7129fe07d97fc17371cThe bottom line is this: The United States is not at war with Iran. There has been no invasion of Iranian territory, no American boots on the ground in Tehran, and no congressional declaration of war. What America has carried out are targeted strikes against Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps assets, sanctions on the regime, and operations against the proxy militias Iran arms and directs. These are measured responses, not war. → Iran has run the exact same kind of conflict for more than 40 years, since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Iran provides material support, weapons, training, cash, and direction to terrorist groups and militias that actively attack and kill Americans. That is textbook proxy warfare. When the United States hits back at IRGC commanders, weapons factories, or proxy command nodes, it is simply responding in kind under the very rules Iran created. Self-defense is not aggression. Here are the receipts, drawn straight from official US government assessments and tracking reports. → First, the Iraq campaign from 2003 to 2011. The IRGC Quds Force armed and trained Shia militias such as Kataib #Hezbollah, #AsaibAhlAlHaq, and others. They supplied explosively formed penetrators, roadside #IEDs, rockets, and advanced training. The Pentagon’s own declassified assessment, released in 2019 and never retracted, states that at least 603 US personnel deaths in Iraq were the direct result of these Iran-backed #militants. → That figure represents roughly 17 percent of all American combat deaths in the entire Iraq war. Thousands more US troops were wounded, many with life-changing injuries from the EFPs designed specifically to defeat American armor. These numbers come directly from Pentagon spokesmen and declassified military reports, later echoed in White House summaries and independent tracking by groups such as the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. → Second, the more recent wave of direct attacks. Starting in 2019 and exploding after October 2023, Iranian proxies carried out more than 180 rocket, #missile, and #drone strikes on US bases across #Iraq, #Syria, and #Jordan. These attacks killed a US contractor at #Kirkuk in December 2019, wounded dozens of American service members in repeated barrages, and in January 2024 killed three US soldiers at Tower 22 in Jordan while injuring more than 40 others. The Pentagon and Central Command have repeatedly attributed coordination and supplies to the #IRGC. The White House itself, in a March 2026 summary of Iranian terrorism, confirmed these figures and the IRGC’s role. That is not ancient history; those are American deaths in the last few years. → Third, Hezbollah. For decades Iran has shipped hundreds of millions of dollars annually, often reaching or exceeding one billion dollars in a single recent year, in cash, precision-guided #missiles, drones, and training. US Treasury and State Department reporting, including 2025 updates, document these transfers funneled through money exchanges and covert channels despite sanctions. Hezbollah has used that support to build the largest rocket arsenal outside any state military and to threaten US partners across the region. The funding line stretches back to the group’s founding in the early 1980s with direct IRGC involvement. → Fourth, the Houthis in Yemen. Iran supplies them with advanced anti-ship #BallisticMissiles, #CruiseMissiles, and attack drones. Those weapons have been used since 2023 to strike US warships, commercial vessels, and Red Sea shipping lanes critical to global trade and American interests. US intelligence and naval reporting tie the technology, training, and direction straight back to #Tehran. This Iranian strategy is not new. It began with the 1983 #BeirutBarracks bombing that killed 241 US Marines, executed by Hezbollah under IRGC guidance. It continued through the #KhobarTowers attack in 1996, the Iraq campaign that claimed those 603 lives, the contractor killing in 2019, the Jordan deaths in 2024, and the ongoing proxy assaults. Forty-plus years of Americans dying because Iran supplies the weapons, the money, the orders, and the deniability. Iran has killed and wounded Americans through cutouts while insisting it is not at war. It hides behind the claim that arming terrorists who attack US troops is somehow different from the United States striking the command nodes and supply lines that make those attacks possible. It is not different. It is the same game. You cannot spend more than four decades funding the deaths of American service members, contractors, and allies, then cry foul when the networks enabling those attacks are dismantled. #SelfDefense is not #escalation. It is the only reasonable response when someone has been trying to kill your people through #proxies for a generation and a half.
Network
Following


























