OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Tauri21d ago
Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me. Blocks are never “empty” unless in the rare cases where a miner mines an empty block. Also blocks have been consistently above 1.2MB full since 2017. They didn’t need a security bailout from spammers. On the other matter, this guy is no authority by any stretch of the imagination. He’s a data analyst and currently it’s practically unknown. I just happen to like his humble and concise way of explaining and thought you might learn something from him too. Spam is a nuanced topic that requires much research to properly understand. I’ve been going through this rabbit hole for 3 years straight. Have you? Maybe if you didn’t have a knee jerk reaction to it, you would think differently. Questioning your biases is a sign of greater intelligence. But it’s painful initially.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: 181ababa324c…

Replying to: 4d24b11d3a1b…

Replies (1)

Scrotus21d ago
It's just matter of semantics. It's true that "not full" does not equal "empty" but I'm pretty sure we both know that... But that does not change the fact that you are claiming a trivial amount of data that is saved by having "not full" blocks justifies all you active measures... But you do you. And the fact that you spent 3 years learning about this and you still think your farcical non solutions is a good idea and that it is going to achieve any sort of consensus is just sad.
0000 sats