OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Nyoro~n35d ago
its not, bip110 blocks remain compatible with exisiting nodes on the network which is why there exist the possibility of wipeout (however small). the wipeout risk wouldnt be solved without a solution like your checkpoint, which is a forced upgrade. ursf to bip110 isnt a softfork
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: add74676b37c…

Replying to: 4eb9ba3cf380…

Replies (1)

Aaron van Wirdum35d ago
Non-upgraded nodes just follow the longest chain, whether that’s the UASF or the URSF/checkpoint chain. They’re both soft forks. But you can believe what you want to believe.
0000 sats