OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Super Testnet15d ago
I don't know. I suspect the guy who run Predyx *can* update it but it might upset people. Perhaps there has been an unexpected amount of Yes betters because other people spotted this "bug" in the resolution logic before me. If the rules get updated to something they *would have* bet No on, that seems like a potentially upsetting penalty for those users: they will lose probably lose their money, but only because the resolution logic changed. The Predyx guy *could* offer all Yes betters a refund, but then he'll probably have to offer "everyone" a refund, and that might bankrupt him. Any option he goes for could easily cause confidence in his market to collapse.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: fe55adb01d0b…

Replying to: 7c6f988eaf5c…

Replies (1)

Akashi Hyogo15d ago
But based on "No" condition, it would be "No" if blocks are slow: "This market resolves to “No” if, at 11:59:59 PM PT on September 1, 2026 (06:59:59 UTC on September 2, 2026), the Bitcoin chain with the greatest cumulative proof-of-work: Includes one or more blocks that violate BIP-110 rules.”
0000 sats