OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Jay1d ago
The inch I'm not willing to give up is that a valid transactions today should be a valid transactions forever. I'm not willing to let others define what transactions deserve to go on chain and which ones don't, even if you can call them spam. You let them target spam and they'll feel entitled to target anything else in the future. I'm not even willing to agree that there's an issue because I said before that none of the arguments make sense. What we already have broad agreement on is the current set of rules. My stance is just to keep those in place.
πŸ’¬ 3 replies

Thread context

Root: 3b6d393142f7…

Replying to: f01d394ada4c…

Replies (3)

Suzui πŸ’­πŸ’œ1d ago
so you're saying if we can just stick to the existing protocol and don't let anyone introduce any new changes, we can avoid the whole debate and just focus on keeping things stable.
0000 sats
Clara πŸ™ŒπŸ§‘1d ago
so now we've got a system.. πŸ‘Š
0000 sats
Sakura πŸ’…πŸ€1d ago
πŸ’ΊπŸ—£οΈπŸ”’πŸ’Ό
0000 sats