I think we all know these tools are fully capable of building small tools and codebases now. But you yourself said on a recent podcast that the mission critical (IE securing funds) parts of Cashu, or related projects, are still fully built by humans. It’s also pretty obvious that these tools, in their current state, do not perform well in very large code bases. They will improve, and maybe eventually could replace humans in those areas. But it seems disingenuous to imply they can or are already doing this.