OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Super Testnet25d ago
Ah yes, I forgot about the mandatory signaling period. Still, if miners keep ignoring BIP110 they may be in for a rude surprise in September: a sudden, completely avoidable loss of income from BIP110 runners. A sufficiently large loss of income should worry any business. They could be sued by their shareholders for negligence.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: ef06c4935833…

Replying to: f8d38172fa78…

Replies (1)

Aaron van Wirdum25d ago
I doubt it would represent a significant loss, and in fact I suspect that adopting BIP110 would harm the value of bitcoin more than losing these people would. But without fork futures markets --which I'm very much in favour of!-- it's anyone's guess unless and until there actually is a split. (That's another argument for a URSF btw, it would enable a very well defined fork futures market.)
0000 sats