OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Super Testnet21d ago
> if some user accidentally used this conditions, his funds will be frozen for 12 months and the unlocked and then *maybe* unlocked if the BIP110 people think it is okay to freeze someone's funds for the *first* year then they may use the same reasons to justify freezing them again for a *second* year, and a *third* year, etc. Better to stop them from doing it the first time imo.
💬 2 replies

Thread context

Root: bf8430845e14…

Replying to: 6a539c015a6e…

Replies (2)

Branca21d ago
That users are using extreme use cases on software bad designed. Its on them. Bitcoin is money, simplicity iis key. Do you want fancy thinga? Use sodtware that use other layersto play. Not in the base layer.
0000 sats
Tauri20d ago
Or *maybe* there won’t be any frozen funds bc: users have never used these heuristics; and a couple of wallet providers had put some guard rails in advance to prevent them this use in the SIX months window before this becomes an issue. Have you forgotten that CORE 30 accidentally deleted user’s wallets? There was no warning about it. Some people reported losing actual money. Do you know why this happened? Apparently it happened because it was too *bothersome* to fix some compatibility issue that existed for years. Do you realise that you’re doing effectively the same thing? Instead of pushing some devs to fix their software, you write other software to help them burry their heads in the sand. That’s also why what you’re doing is irresponsible.
000
0 sats