OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Aaron van Wirdum35d ago
Wrong. 📝 725ea56f…
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: e301dcd138d6…

Replying to: 40a2ad16e34e…

Replies (1)

Nyoro~n35d ago
ultimately without a coinciding ursf to bip110, the chainsplits cannot coexist. its just the same utxo set. functionally, you're not going to be able to interact with the network(s) properly as there would exist no mechanism to prevent your tx to not replay on all networks. the idea that a stalled bip110 attempt creates an opportunity for proponents to forward bitcoins to detractors is wishful thinking 😅 or possibly pure avarice
0000 sats