OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
Super Testnet20d ago
It seems wrong to write the deadline first and then tell wallet devs to cripple Miniscript before that deadline, when you could instead fix your software so that it just doesn't break Miniscript in the first place.
💬 3 replies

Thread context

Root: bf8430845e14…

Replying to: 31a293ecb01e…

Replies (3)

Branca20d ago
For me, wrong is the atrocity that Coee did. You are not measiring same level of damage. This will be a minor collateral damage, and a good oportunity for those whom use mimiscript to move on to better implementarion. There is plenty of time.
0000 sats
Jj bbc xkb 20d ago
i agree with this point of view on a first principles basis. dont you think, that the cost of presumably 0.01% super technically versed bitcoiners to adapt their utxos within 6 months is by far smaller then the opportunity cost on all node-runners in case BIP110 doesnt archieve a majority? did you propose a change in the code, that might mitigate that risk?
0000 sats
Tauri19d ago
> cripple Miniscript What an odd choice of words. 🤔
0000 sats