Correct, I had to remember that a couples of times a day 🤝

🧐🤓🎯

Truth doesn’t need a majority vote. If it did, we’d still believe the sun revolves around the earth.

My version of the truth is I hate everyone equally because you let social media destroy everything I value. Fuck both sides of the majority, fuck your played-out diversity pandering AND fuck your holier-than-thou attitude towards minorities. Fuck all of you out here on the internet, I was here first - as in on the internet - in the 90s and 00s and you fucking STOLE the only place I was able to be myself. I DESPISE YOU.

follow me. I follow back

whenever I see someone subscribing to stoic philosophy I know they are either recovering or heading into depression

There are reasons behind why they believe in their version of the truth. If it's slightly better than the current reality then they will get people to a better place. The problem is that we're such imperfect beings that our versions of the truth are pale replica of actual truth... so it's much better to just let me Universe drive instead of scheming and plotting. Anyone that wants to explore this more can check out my conversation with @ivy lumi 📝 cb5d9295…

Most people don’t seek truth; they seek validation. Truth is lonely by design.

most can’t handle the truth

There is truth but we cannot observe it. We can only know our version of the truth. This was known to philosophers as early as Plato and refined by Kant.

I hope that this the person that constantly tells me to find Christ... and I keep telling her that Christ found me.

true 🤗

One truth many people on here are not ready to face: Pubky beats nostr in almost every technical aspect. https://pubky.app/post/gujx6qd8ksydh1makdphd3bxu351d9b8wa…

There is no such thing as truth seeking without seeking engagement, and there is no such thing as engagement without fighting on behalf of one's own beliefs. Anyone who feels threatened by people pushing their own version of the truth isn't on the side of truth themselves.

It’s not about who comes out on top, as long as the truth is clear.

By baking into the assertion the notion that everyone can have their own “version of truth”, you take facts, discussion and reasoning out of the analysis. “The Truth” is independent of any person. Nobody owns it.

High time preference tribalism in an unstable world, seeking safety in "my side winning". Bitcoin slows down and stabilizes society, in doing so it provides the solution to this problem.

💯 ✨🗽

Truth seekers are curious and ask questions..

Your article doesn't answer my questions. Lazy bastard.

We have a name for that. We call it populism.

Yessir

Real truth is sought and found by those who have nothing to lose finding it, nor expect a price at the other end. Lies are the walls built by those who have to pay up the price to the truthseekers when they eventually find it.

On Nostr I just spray and pray that a Relay will store my data and that other users will connect to one of the Relays that sotred my data. In Pubky my Keypair is a censorship resistant DNS record that tells users where I store my Data (PKDNS). This offers a guarantee that I have all of the data that a User published, that I get the newest published version (mutability is still a big pain point in Nostr as Relays don't always respect updates or might not pick up on them) and on top of this is much easier to scale to a much larger Userbase. While both systems will to a certain degree rely on certain centralized data aggregators, on Nostr most Data will end on a handful of Relays. In Pubky you're likely going to see Indexers aggregate the Data from many Homeservers to build your Social Graph. Replacing an index that malbehaves is a matter of seconds. Replacing a few centralized Relays that host most of the data is much harder at scale. Regarding pubky.app, which is basically the first pubky-core based social application, there are some cool features like tags available with many more on the Roadmap for this year.

That's a very keen response to what I said. I am a firm believer of the idea that when engagement occurs early enough, and when the participants are creative enough, nobody will ever have to test bad ideas out in reality to see that they are bad. But in practice I can't agree with your limits. There are many who believe that others have no right to self defense, and some of those people choose to hurt others. If I had to, I would be willing to disprove their faulty belief the hard way, even if it means crossing the threshold where it inflicts pain on them.