These matters are very hard to understand for the layman, and so “thinking” like this which is entirely surface layer is expected and perfectly normal.
They really aren’t. Pointing out that they also invest in companies that do KYC is just a fact. One you clearly don’t like, so you resort to mental gymnastics and semantic theater to justify it. No one is falling for it.
I think it matters because going KYC opens you up to VC money and banks, a step closer to the money printer. So they already have access to investment money. Focusing on non-KYC is a principle that is lacking here.