From @separ8 on X The absurdity here is almost performance art. A decentralized network security model is explicitly built around independent nodes enforcing policy. That’s the whole point. That’s the backbone. And the new argument is: “Well yes, large miners can bypass the policy network entirely… but that’s just reality. So we should normalize it.” Normalize it? In a decentralized system? 🤣 So let me get this straight: Miners can bypass nodes. Therefore, bypassing nodes is just “leveling the playing field.” If miners can openly route around the policy layer whenever it’s profitable, then what exactly is the policy layer? A suggestion box? A vibes-based firewall? That’s not decentralization. That’s decentralization cosplay. Calling it “harm reduction” is the cherry on top. 🤡 BIP-110 For Bitcoin Decentralization Preservation 🌱

Also read BIP 110, you are again talking nonsense. Is it because of you are retarded? Or just acting in bad faith? Do you see how you position yourself and then you screem the other people have their opinions about you and your propaganda? https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0110.medi…

"everyone who doesn't support changing Bitcoin into a childporn and meme hosting service is a bot" Seriously? Thats your defence? So just because I don't support pedophiles that means I'm not a real person?

Agreed. BIP-110 doesn’t fix this, although it is a step in the right direction. If enough minds come together then something might get discussed that does “fix it.” Until then… #runknots #runbip110 #bitcoin #runcorebip110

Bullshit. You agree with filling our network with CSAM? What happened to you man?

Ser, It’s Coremies and Knotzis. *Continue.