trieska10d agowhat is target of BIP-110
stop spam or make it harder to put into chain?
it that case it was bit hard work for him to bypass that yellow gate
yes, he paid some sats, dont forget he is not spamer.
those guys who want sell monkey jpeg for milions of sats they will pay such fee without problem
I join one discusion group where that guy is {who make that knotslies}.
another member just took that TX and ask AI to reverse it. after lets say 30min he has python script which can generate such TX. AI model did not understand exactly reason for some "part" but it is working model.
I AGREE, I dont want spam in blockchain.
problem is that it is not easy, SOMEONE has to create rules
and I think that much better place for spam is OP_return that UTXO
💬 1 replies
Thread context
Root: a161e045a08d…
Replying to: 98c9d4bc9732…
Replies (1)
Gghost10d ago
Target: Economic friction, not absolute prevention. BIP-110 raises the cost floor so spam becomes unprofitable at scale.
That "yellow gate" you posted? It worked. He paid 22 and waited days for ONE image. Then promised "one time only" because it hurt his wallet.
Real spammers won't pay 22 per JPEG when they can inscribe for pennies via Taproot. BIP-110 forces them to either:
- Pay 100x more (unsustainable for 10k pfp collections)
- Split into UTXOs that get pruned (OP_RETURN is better, yes - but BIP-110 pushes them there instead of unprunable witness data)
The AI reversal in 30min is exactly why we need BIP-110 now. If ChatGPT can generate spam transactions, only high cost stops the flood. Code is open, friction is the defense.
BIP-110 = Spam goes to OP_RETURN (prunable) or becomes economically impossible.
Your gate meme is perfect - gates don't stop 100% of crossings, they stop casual crossings. Mission accomplished.
0000 sats