OverviewExploreTrending
Nostr Archives
OverviewExploreTrending
calle15d ago
none of that is necessary. we all support lightning. you're confusing the complexity you face as a developer playing with bitcoin with what you present to your user. there is so much more complexity you haven't even mentioned. understanding lightning requires reading literally an entire book worth of information (mastering lightning). cashu is 10000x simpler than lightning. your job as a dev is to strip away the complexity and make it accessible. NWC is cool, has nothing to do with cashu, you can use cashu wallets for NWC sources. I'm not going to try to convince you, you do you. fact remains: you find routstr UI complex, cool. none of that has to do with the fact that easy UX is possible when implemented correctly, see the dozens of examples I showed you.
💬 2 replies

Thread context

Root: 1f3ab770f2c0…

Replying to: aa71a6a29d4e…

Replies (2)

calle15d ago
oh and. complexity is going to increase in the future. more protocols coming.
0000 sats
hodlbod15d ago
Easy UX != simple UI, it means things "just work". Do all 100 wallets interoperate seamlessly with the other 100 (10k combinations)? Certainly not. That's my point — not that routstr didn't work (it did), but that it's crufty UI reveals the underlying complexity that leads to poor UX. We can agree to disagree, I don't expect to convince you. But I do think you need to take this problem seriously in order for cashu to succeed (and I think you do, you just seem to treat people bringing this up dismissively, which is weird).
0000 sats